R. Johnson v. Megan Brennan, et al
| Board Gov., USP, Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General and A. Cortez, U.S. Congress |
| R. Wayne Johnson |
| 19-5356 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE [1827285] to order [ # 1820895-2 ] filed by R. Wayne Johnson (Service Date: 02/06/2020 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 3 pages. [19-5356] [Entered: 02/06/2020 10:07 AM] |
| RECEIPT [1827287] received from illegible [signed for on 01/07/2020] for documents [ # 1820898-2 ] sent to Appellant R. Wayne Johnson [19-5356] [Entered: 02/06/2020 10:09 AM] |
| LETTER [1820898] sent to warden sending Clerk order order by warden letter [ # 1820895-4 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 01/21/2020. [19-5356] [Entered: 12/19/2019 02:23 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1820895] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 01/21/2020. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [19-5356] [Entered: 12/19/2019 02:12 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1820812] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01205-UNA filed by R. Wayne Johnson. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5356. [19-5356] [Entered: 12/19/2019 10:55 AM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [19-5356] [Entered: 12/19/2019 10:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
