Brud Rossman v. Miriam Sewell, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Metropolitan Police Department, John Doe N, William Lyke, Detective, Sergey Ivanov, Les Vermillion, John Doe 2, Andrew Reese, Director, Rehabilitation Services Administration, Peter Newsham, Chief of Police, John Doe 1 and Miriam Sewell, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brad Rudolph Rossman
Case Number: 20-7064
Filed: July 9, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2020 APPELLANT BRIEF and APPENDIX [1859164] filed by Brad Rudolph Rossman [Service Date: 08/31/2020 ] Length of Brief: 7 pages. [20-7064] [Entered: 08/31/2020 05:36 PM]
July 16, 2020 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1853279] received from N/A [signed for on 07/13/2020] for order [1850873-2] sent to Appellant Brad Rudolph Rossman [20-7064] [Entered: 07/23/2020 05:03 PM]
July 10, 2020 NOTICE [1851357] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court of exhibit to Notice of Appeal [20-7064] [Entered: 07/13/2020 01:07 PM]
July 9, 2020 FIRST CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1850873] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7019070000005269] of order [ # 1850871-4 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 08/10/2020 from Brad Rudolph Rossman. [20-7064] [Entered: 07/09/2020 02:18 PM]
July 9, 2020 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1850867] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-01425-UNA filed by Brad Rudolph Rossman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-7064. [20-7064] [Entered: 07/09/2020 02:02 PM]
July 9, 2020 CLERK'S ORDER [1850871] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 08/28/2020. APPENDIX due 08/28/2020, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [20-7064] [Entered: 07/09/2020 02:10 PM]
July 9, 2020 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-7064] [Entered: 07/09/2020 02:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brud Rossman v. Miriam Sewell, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Metropolitan Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe N
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: William Lyke, Detective
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Sergey Ivanov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Les Vermillion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Andrew Reese, Director, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Peter Newsham, Chief of Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Miriam Sewell, Rehabilitation Services Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Brad Rudolph Rossman
Represented By: Brad Rudolph Rossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?