Maria Sicinska v. Google
Respondent / Appellee: Google, and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Maria Sicinska
Case Number: 20-7101
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 MOTION [1875992] for other relief filed by Length Certification: 1 pages. [20-7101] [Entered: 12/16/2020 12:33 PM]
December 8, 2020 RESPONSE [1875289] to order [ # 1867811-5 ] filed by Maria Sicinska (Service Date: 12/10/2020 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 22 pages. [20-7101] [Entered: 12/10/2020 03:15 PM]
November 24, 2020 SUPPLEMENT [1873406] to motion for other relief [ # 1871518-2 ] filed by Maria Sicinska [Service Date: 11/30/2020 ] [20-7101] [Entered: 11/30/2020 08:40 AM]
November 17, 2020 SUPPLEMENT [1871974] to motion for other relief [ # 1871518-2 ] filed by Maria Sicinska [Service Date: 11/19/2020 ] [20-7101] [Entered: 11/19/2020 08:58 AM]
November 12, 2020 MOTION [1871518] filed by Maria Sicinska for other relief [Service Date: 11/17/2020 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [20-7101] [Entered: 11/17/2020 08:53 AM]
October 23, 2020 INTERNATIONAL MAIL SENT [1867815] with return receipt requested of order [ # 1867811-5 ]. Acknowledgment of Receipt due 11/23/2020 from Maria Sicinska. [20-7101] [Entered: 10/23/2020 09:55 AM]
October 23, 2020 CLERK'S ORDER [1867811] filed removing case from abeyance; to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 12/22/2020. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. The Clerk is directed to send two copies of this order to appellant by air mail and request appellant return one copy of the order with a certification that it has been received. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [20-7101] [Entered: 10/23/2020 09:37 AM]
October 23, 2020 NOTICE [1867807] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 20-7101: IFP] [20-7101] [Entered: 10/23/2020 09:26 AM]
October 19, 2020 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1867022] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-00259-UNA filed by Maria Sicinska. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-7101. [20-7101] [Entered: 10/19/2020 12:58 PM]
October 19, 2020 CLERK'S ORDER [1867025] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 20-7101 held in abeyance pending IFP decision in 1:20cv259-UNA from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [20-7101] [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:12 PM]
October 19, 2020 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-7101] [Entered: 10/19/2020 12:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Maria Sicinska v. Google
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Google, and others
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Maria Sicinska
Represented By: Maria Sicinska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?