CA Communities Against Toxics, et al v. EPA, et al
| Natural Resources Defense Council, California Communities Against Toxics and Sierra Club |
| Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency |
| 21-1041 |
| January 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1882623] filed by Meghan E. Greenfield on behalf of Respondent EPA in 21-1026, 21-1041. [21-1026, 21-1041] (Greenfield, Meghan) [Entered: 01/29/2021 06:22 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1882792] filed by Eric G. Hostetler on behalf of Respondents EPA and Jane Nishida in 21-1026, 21-1041. [21-1026, 21-1041] (Hostetler, Eric) [Entered: 01/29/2021 01:42 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1882015] filed consolidating cases 21-1041 (Consolidation started 01/27/2021) with 21-1026; directing party to file in 21-1041 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 02/26/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 02/26/2021 [21-1026, 21-1041] [Entered: 01/27/2021 10:07 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1882012] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1882010-2 ] [21-1041] [Entered: 01/27/2021 10:03 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1882010] of a decision by federal agency filed by California Communities Against Toxics, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club [Service Date: 01/25/2021 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [21-1041] [Entered: 01/27/2021 10:02 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1041] [Entered: 01/27/2021 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
