Harvey Larson v. Cliff Congo, et al
| Harvey E. Larson |
| Cliff Congo, Petitions Attorney, John Doe, Examiner, John Doe, Director and John Doe, Commissioner for Patents |
| 21-7076 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT [1911585] received from Illegible [signed for on 08/05/2021] for documents [ # 1908095-2 ] sent to Appellant Harvey E. Larson [21-7076] [Entered: 08/25/2021 04:14 PM] |
| NOTICE [1910344] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court of an amended notice of appeal [21-7076] [Entered: 08/16/2021 02:59 PM] |
| PRIVATE PRISONER CASE docketed. [21-7076] [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:03 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1908088] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-01384-UNA filed by Harvey E. Larson. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-7076. [21-7076] [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:04 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1908093] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 09/27/2021. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [21-7076] [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:26 PM] |
| LETTER [1908095] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1908093-5 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 08/27/2021. [21-7076] [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
