Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC, et al v. EPA
Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC and Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC |
Environmental Protection Agency |
22-1015 |
February 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC v. EPA |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1934277] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER statement of issues due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER underlying decision due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER procedural motions due 03/10/2022. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 03/25/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 03/10/2022. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 03/10/2022. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 03/25/2022. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 03/25/2022 [22-1015] [Entered: 02/08/2022 02:13 PM] |
CERTIFIED COPY [1934276] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1934274-2 ] [22-1015] [Entered: 02/08/2022 02:03 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW [1934274] of a decision by federal agency filed by Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC and Wynnewood Refining Company, LLC [Service Date: 02/04/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [22-1015] [Entered: 02/08/2022 02:01 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [22-1015] [Entered: 02/08/2022 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.