David Wattleton v. DOJ
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice
Case Number: 22-5337
Filed: December 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1985007] received from Illegible [signed for on 01/30/2023] for order [1983010-2] sent to Appellant David Earl Wattleton [22-5337] [Entered: 02/08/2023 08:54 AM]
January 25, 2023 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1983010] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 6833] of order [ # 1983000-6 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 02/24/2023 from David Earl Wattleton. [22-5337] [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:54 AM]
January 25, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1983000] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 02/24/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 03/13/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 02/24/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 02/24/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 02/24/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 03/13/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5337] [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:26 AM]
January 24, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1982865] filed dismissing as moot motion ifp in this Court [ # 1982669-2 ] [Case Number 22-5337: IFP] [22-5337] [Entered: 01/24/2023 12:29 PM]
January 17, 2023 PRISONER CONSENT TO COLLECTION [1982675] filed by David Earl Wattleton [22-5337] [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:23 PM]
January 17, 2023 PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT REPORT [1982677] filed by David Earl Wattleton [22-5337] [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:25 PM]
January 17, 2023 MOTION [1982669] to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [Case Number 22-5337: IFP Pending USCA] filed by David Earl Wattleton [Service Date: 01/23/2023 ] Length Certification: 7 Pages. [22-5337] [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:17 PM]
December 27, 2022 LETTER [1979131] sent to warden sending Clerk orders [ # 1979127-5 ], [ # 1979121-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 01/26/2023. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:52 AM]
December 27, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1979121] filed vacating Clerk order ifp motion or docket fee [ # 1978945-2 ]. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/27/2022 09:41 AM]
December 27, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1979127] filed directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 01/26/2023. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 01/26/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:47 AM]
December 23, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1978931] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00145-BAH filed by David Earl Wattleton. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5337. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/23/2022 11:10 AM]
December 23, 2022 NOTICE [1978933] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 22-5337: IFP] [22-5337] [Entered: 12/23/2022 11:16 AM]
December 23, 2022 LETTER [1978950] sent to warden sending Clerk order ifp motion or docket fee [ # 1978945-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 01/23/2023. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/23/2022 11:53 AM]
December 23, 2022 US PRISONER CASE docketed. [22-5337] [Entered: 12/23/2022 11:08 AM]
December 23, 2022 [ORDER VACATED BY 12/27/22 ORDER]--CLERK'S ORDER [1978945] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 01/23/2023; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 01/23/2023, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5337]--[Edited 12/27/2022 by AY] [Entered: 12/23/2022 11:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Wattleton v. DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: David Earl Wattleton
Represented By: Warden (Rochester)
Represented By: David Earl Wattleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?