Renjie Zhan v. International Bank for Reconstruction and Develop
Plaintiff / Appellant: Renjie Zhan
Defendant / Appellee: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Case Number: 22-7032
Filed: March 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2022 NOTICE [1943807] of filing not accepted for filing in district court filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/21/2022 ] [22-7032] [Entered: 04/21/2022 10:15 AM]
April 4, 2022 NOTICE [1941901] of district court filings filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/05/2022 ] [22-7032] [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:04 AM]
April 4, 2022 NOTICE [1941902] of district court filings filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/05/2022 ] [22-7032] [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:07 AM]
April 4, 2022 NOTICE [1941900] of district court filings filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/05/2022 ] [22-7032] [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:03 AM]
April 4, 2022 DUPLICATE MOTION [1941894] to appoint counsel filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/05/2022 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [22-7032] [Entered: 04/05/2022 10:58 AM]
April 4, 2022 NOTICE [1941905] of district court filings filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 04/05/2022 ] [22-7032] [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:08 AM]
March 25, 2022 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1940623] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8679 6265] of order [ # 1940621-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/25/2022 from Renjie Zhan. [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:49 PM]
March 25, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1940611] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02793-UNA filed by Renjie Zhan. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7032. [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:33 PM]
March 25, 2022 NOTICE [1940614] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is filed [Case Number 22-7032: IFP] [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:35 PM]
March 25, 2022 MOTION [1940617] to appoint counsel filed by Renjie Zhan [Service Date: 03/25/2022 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:37 PM]
March 25, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1940621] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 04/25/2022. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:40 PM]
March 25, 2022 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7032] [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Renjie Zhan v. International Bank for Reconstruction and Develop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Renjie Zhan
Represented By: Renjie Zhan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?