George Washington University v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company
| George Washington University |
| Factory Mutual Insurance Company |
| 22-7132 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REPLY [1974623] filed by George Washington University to response [ # 1973629-2 ] [Service Date: 11/21/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,597 words. [22-7132] (Schlesinger, Matthew) [Entered: 11/21/2022 08:32 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1973629] to motion to certify question of law [ # 1972302-2 ] filed by Factory Mutual Insurance Company [Service Date: 11/14/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 5,180 Words. [22-7132] (Friedman, Bryce) [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:16 PM] |
| MOTION [1972302] to certify question of law filed by George Washington University (Service Date: 11/04/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 5,157 Words. [22-7132] (Itami, Todd) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:17 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1972303] filed by George Washington University [Service Date: 11/04/2022 ] [22-7132] (Itami, Todd) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:19 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1972306] filed by George Washington University [Service Date: 11/04/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-7132] (Itami, Todd) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:23 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1972300] filed by Factory Mutual Insurance Company [Service Date: 11/04/2022 ] [22-7132] (Friedman, Bryce) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:13 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1972304] filed by George Washington University [Service Date: 11/04/2022 ] [22-7132] (Itami, Todd) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:20 PM] |
| STATEMENT [1972299] with Disclosure Listing filed by Factory Mutual Insurance Company [Service Date: 11/04/2022 ] [22-7132] (Friedman, Bryce) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:10 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1972298] filed by Todd T. Itami and co-counsel Matthew J. Schlesinger on behalf of Appellant George Washington University. [22-7132] (Itami, Todd) [Entered: 11/04/2022 05:08 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1972297] filed by Bryce L. Friedman and co-counsel Isaac Rethy on behalf of Appellee Factory Mutual Insurance Company. [22-7132] (Friedman, Bryce) [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:59 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1967636] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-03006-DLF filed by George Washington University. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7132. [22-7132] [Entered: 10/05/2022 12:00 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1967638] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 11/04/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/21/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 11/04/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 11/04/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 11/04/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/21/2022 [22-7132] [Entered: 10/05/2022 12:05 PM] |
| LETTER [1967639] sent regarding attorney membership to Matthew J. Schlesinger for George Washington University. Application for Admission due 11/04/2022. [22-7132] [Entered: 10/05/2022 12:09 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7132] [Entered: 10/05/2022 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
