Stephen Edwards v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Stephen S. Edwards
Defendant / Appellee: The Charles Schwab Corporation and United States of America
Case Number: 23-5010
Filed: January 17, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 NOTICE [1989301] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is denied [Case Number 23-5010: IFP Denied USDC] [23-5010] [Entered: 03/09/2023 12:43 PM]
March 9, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1989319] filed removing case from abeyance; Appellant is directed to file payment of docketing fee or file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis due 04/10/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [23-5010] [Entered: 03/09/2023 01:32 PM]
March 9, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1989323] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 04/10/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [23-5010] [Entered: 03/09/2023 01:44 PM]
January 26, 2023 FIRST CLASS MAIL RETURNED [1983872] marked "Return to sender, vacant, unable to forward". Mail had been sent to Party Stephen S. Edwards. [23-5010] [Entered: 01/31/2023 08:39 AM]
January 17, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1981664] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 23-5010 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:19cv3614-EGS-RMM from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [23-5010] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:15 PM]
January 17, 2023 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1981659] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-03614-EGS-RMM filed by Stephen S. Edwards. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5010. [23-5010] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:02 PM]
January 17, 2023 LETTER [1981662] sent regarding attorney membership to Paul Daniel Schmitt for The Charles Schwab Corporation. Application for Admission due 02/16/2023. [23-5010] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:06 PM]
January 17, 2023 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5010] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Edwards v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Stephen S. Edwards
Represented By: Stephen S. Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: The Charles Schwab Corporation
Represented By: Paul Daniel Schmitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?