John Holtman v. IBM
| John Holtman |
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| 23-7005 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes Arbitration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1989124] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 04/17/2023. APPENDIX due 04/17/2023. APPELLEE Brief due on 05/17/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 06/07/2023 [23-7002, 23-7005] [Entered: 03/08/2023 12:01 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1988693] filed consolidating cases 23-7005 (Consolidation started 03/06/2023) with 23-7002 [23-7002, 23-7005] [Entered: 03/06/2023 12:52 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1986255] submitted by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 02:01 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1986254] filed by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 02:00 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1986326] filed by Anthony J. Dick and co-counsel Craig S. Friedman; Matthew W. Lampe; Patrick M. Corley on behalf of Appellee IBM. [23-7005] (Dick, Anthony) [Entered: 02/16/2023 07:09 PM] |
| STATEMENT [1986329] with Disclosure Listing filed by IBM [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Dick, Anthony) [Entered: 02/16/2023 07:17 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1986252] filed by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:59 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1986327] filed by IBM [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Dick, Anthony) [Entered: 02/16/2023 07:12 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1986251] filed by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:58 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1986246] filed by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:55 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1986245] filed by John Holtman [Service Date: 02/16/2023 ] [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:54 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1986247] filed by Shannon Liss-Riordan and co-counsel Michelle Cassorla on behalf of Appellant John Holtman. [23-7005] (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:56 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1981674] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00852-APM filed by John Holtman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7005. [23-7005] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:39 PM] |
| LETTER [1981676] sent regarding attorney membership to Thomas R. Chiavetta for IBM. Application for Admission due 02/16/2023. [23-7005] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:40 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1981677] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 02/16/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 03/03/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 02/16/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 02/16/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 02/16/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 03/03/2023 [23-7005] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:42 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-7005] [Entered: 01/17/2023 12:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
