Employees' Retirement Plan Of The National Edu, et al v. Clark County Education Association
| Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association and Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association of the United States |
| Clark County Education Association |
| 24-7067 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2057026] filed by Clark County Education Association [Service Date: 05/30/2024 ] [24-7067] (Stephens, Arlus) [Entered: 05/30/2024 01:03 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2052924] filed by Arlus J. Stephens on behalf of Appellee Clark County Education Association. [24-7067] (Stephens, Arlus) [Entered: 05/06/2024 10:43 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2052344] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/31/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/17/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/31/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/31/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/31/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/17/2024 [24-7067] [Entered: 05/01/2024 02:04 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2052341] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03443-RDM filed by Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association and Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association of the United States. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7067. [24-7067] [Entered: 05/01/2024 02:02 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7067] [Entered: 05/01/2024 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Employees' Retirement Plan Of The National Edu, et al v. Clark County Education Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Powell McDermott Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association of the United States | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Powell McDermott Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clark County Education Association | |
| Represented By: | Arlus Jeremiah Stephens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
