In re: Corel Software LLC
In re: COREL SOFTWARE LLC |
MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
19-124 |
July 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER filed. The motion [ # 6 ] is granted. Microsoft Corporations response is due no later than July 19, 2019, and Corels reply is due no later than July 24, 2019. (Per Curiam). Service: 07/11/2019 by clerk. [620348] [NEL] [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:29 PM] |
Filing 9 Entry of appearance for Danielle Rosenthal as of counsel for Petitioner Corel Software LLC. Service: 07/11/2019 by email. [620304] [19-124] [Danielle Rosenthal] [Entered: 07/11/2019 12:14 PM] |
Filing 8 Entry of appearance for Jonathan Lamberson as of counsel for Respondent Microsoft Corporation. Service: 07/10/2019 by email. [620167] [19-124] [Jonathan Lamberson] [Entered: 07/10/2019 05:37 PM] |
Filing 7 Entry of appearance for Frank E. Scherkenbach as principal counsel for Respondent Microsoft Corporation. Service: 07/10/2019 by email. [620163] [19-124] [Frank Scherkenbach] [Entered: 07/10/2019 05:31 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION of Petitioner Corel Software LLC and Respondent Microsoft Corporation to extend the time to 07/19/2019 to Extend time to 7/19/19 for Respondent's Response Brief to petition for writ of mandamus and extend time to 7/24/19 for Petitioner's Reply Brief to petition for writ of mandamus to file the Respondent's Response Brief to petition for writ of mandamus and Petitioner's Reply Brief to petition for writ of mandamus. [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 07/10/2019 by email. [620162] [19-124] --[Edited 07/11/2019 by CAB to add proper relief] [Aaron Fahrenkrog] [Entered: 07/10/2019 05:19 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER filed requesting a response to [ # 2 ] Petition for Writ of Mandamus. By: Clerk (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [619345] [JAL] [Entered: 07/05/2019 04:48 PM] |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Petitioner Corel Software LLC. Service: 07/05/2019 by email, US mail. [619301] [19-124] [Aaron Fahrenkrog] [Entered: 07/05/2019 03:13 PM] |
Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Aaron R. Fahrenkrog as principal counsel for Petitioner Corel Software LLC. Service: 07/05/2019 by email, US mail. [619300] [19-124] [Aaron Fahrenkrog] [Entered: 07/05/2019 03:12 PM] |
Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioner Corel Software LLC for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21 [Consent: opposed]. Service: 07/05/2019 by US mail. [619276] [JAL] [Entered: 07/05/2019 02:21 PM] |
Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 07/05/2019. [619274] Entry of Appearance is due 07/19/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 07/19/2019. [JAL] [Entered: 07/05/2019 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Corel Software LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MICROSOFT CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Jonathan J. Lamberson |
Represented By: | Frank Scherkenbach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: COREL SOFTWARE LLC | |
Represented By: | Aaron Robert Fahrenkrog Esq. |
Represented By: | Danielle Rosenthal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.