Moorecherry v. MSPB
NICOLE MOORECHERRY |
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD |
19-2442 |
September 26, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Jeffrey Gauger as principal counsel for Respondent MSPB. Service: 09/27/2019 by email. [638614] [19-2442] [Jeffrey Gauger] [Entered: 09/27/2019 09:02 AM] |
Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/24/2019. [638492] 15(c) due on 10/10/2019. Entry of Appearance due 10/10/2019. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/10/2019. Docketing Statement due 10/28/2019. Certified List due on 11/05/2019. [MMA] [Entered: 09/26/2019 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Moorecherry v. MSPB | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: NICOLE MOORECHERRY | |
Represented By: | Cheri L. Cannon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Gauger Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.