Aftechmobile Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: SALESFORCE.COM, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: AFTECHMOBILE INC.
Case Number: 21-1105
Filed: October 26, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 13, 2021 AFTECHMOBILE INC. v. SALESFORCE.COM, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Filing 9 Corrected Entry of appearance for Dan L. Bagatell; Jose C. Villareal; Chao "Wendy" Wang; Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur; Tara L. Kurtis as counsel for Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc.. Service: 11/12/2020 by email. [735203] [21-1105] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 11/12/2020 05:23 PM]
November 10, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc., Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/18/2020. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [734676] [KMH] [Entered: 11/10/2020 09:34 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 7 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Aftechmobile Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734435] [21-1105] [Matthew Wawrzyn] [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:17 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 6 Entry of appearance for Matthew Michael Wawrzyn as counsel for Appellant Aftechmobile Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734434] [21-1105] [Matthew Wawrzyn] [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:16 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 5 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Aftechmobile Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734433] [21-1105] [Matthew Wawrzyn] [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:15 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 4 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734426] [21-1105] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 11/09/2020 09:54 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 3 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734425] [21-1105] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 11/09/2020 09:53 AM]
November 9, 2020 Filing 2 Entry of appearance for Dan L. Bagatell; Jose C. Villarreal; Chao "Wendy" Wang; Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur; Tara L. Kurtis as counsel for Appellee Salesforce.com, Inc.. Service: 11/09/2020 by email. [734424] [21-1105] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 8 ] [Dan Bagatell] [Entered: 11/09/2020 09:52 AM]
October 26, 2020 Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 10/21/2020. [731420] Entry of Appearance is due on 11/09/2020. Certificate of Interest is due on 11/09/2020. Docketing Statement is due on 11/09/2020. Appellant's brief is due on 12/28/2020. [KMH] [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aftechmobile Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SALESFORCE.COM, INC.
Represented By: Amisha Kamlesh Manek
Represented By: Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur
Represented By: Jose Carlos Villarreal
Represented By: Chao Wang
Represented By: Tara Lauren Kurtis
Represented By: Dan L. Bagatell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: AFTECHMOBILE INC.
Represented By: Matthew Michael Wawrzyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?