Atkins v. Sharpe
| REBEKAH A. ATKINS |
| ROGER A. G. SHARPE, Clerk, ALLISON, Chief Deputy Clerk, EVELYN, Administrative Matters (including personnel) HR of Clerk's Office, HARRIETT SYMMES HARMAN, MICHELLE IMEL, Deputy Clerk, LANA HARVES, Deputy Clerk, TINA DOYLE, Deputy Clerk, TANESA GENIER, Deputy Clerk, BEN ROGERS, Deputy Clerk, PAM POPE, Deputy Clerk, AMY HOLTZ, Deputy Clerk, AUDREYALICE WARNER, Deputy Clerk, GEETA DEVELLEN, Deputy Clerk, TRICIA BLANFORD, Deputy Clerk, CARRIE GRIFFIN, Deputy Clerk, UNKNOWN OR UNNAMED OR REFUSED TO IDENTIFY, All Staff, Administrative, Assistants, and Deputy Clerks, Birch Bayh Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse, REBEKAH FARRINGTON, Divisional Operations Manager, KAREN, Deputy Clerk, LAURA TOWNSEND, Deputy-in-Charge, New Albany Division, TARA COTTINGHAM, UNKNOWN OR UNNAMED OR REFUSED TO IDENTIFY, All Staff, Administrative, Assistants, and Deputy Clerks, Lee H. Hamilton Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse, JOHN BLANKENBERGER, Deputy Clerk, KEVIN P. DEMPSEY, Clerk, GUS WEEKS, Chief Deputy Clerk, UNKNOWN OR UNNAMED OR REFUSED TO IDENTIFY, All Staff, Administrative, Assistants, and Deputy Clerks, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse, STACY ENLOW, Operations Manager Deputy at/in Charge, LORI STUCKWISCH, Manager-Office, AMANDA BENSON, Deputy Clerk, ERIC DIXON, Supervisor, Deputy Clerk, AMBER HAMPTON, Deputy Clerk, TIMOTHY J. CALLAHAN, IT Tech with Clerk's Office and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS NOT YET DISCOVERED |
| 21-2346 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed terminating appeal; The appeal is dismissed. All pending motions are denied. Each side shall bear its own costs. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [812988] [NL] [Entered: 11/17/2021 09:57 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Copy of Order from United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. [804027]--[Edited 10/13/2021 by MMA - Reason: to correct filing event] [JCP] [Entered: 10/06/2021 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION of Appellant Ms. Rebekah A. Atkins VERIFIED MOTION FOR APPELLATE COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY. Service: 09/27/2021 by clerk, email. [801948] [21-2346] [Rebekah Atkins] [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 MODIFIED ENTRY: INFORMAL BRIEF FILED with APPENDIX by Appellant Ms. Rebekah A. Atkins. Service: 09/27/2021 by email. Unless ordered otherwise, any responsive deadline runs from the date of service of this brief. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. [801945]--[Edited 10/13/2021 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Rebekah Atkins] [Entered: 09/27/2021 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION of Appellant Ms. Rebekah A. Atkins for an emergency stay pending appeal under Rule 8/18. Service: 09/26/2021 by clerk, email. [801804] [21-2346]--[Edited 09/27/2021 by JAL to correct relief] [Rebekah Atkins] [Entered: 09/26/2021 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant Ms. Rebekah A. Atkins for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 09/26/2021 by clerk, email. [801803] [21-2346] [Rebekah Atkins] [Entered: 09/26/2021 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and Consent to Electronic Filing for Appellant Ms. Rebekah A. Atkins. Service: 09/26/2021 by clerk, email. [801802] [21-2346]--[Edited 09/27/2021 by MMA to revise docket text] [Rebekah Atkins] [Entered: 09/26/2021 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 09/16/2021. [801417] Entry of Appearance due 10/07/2021. Appellant/Petitioner's Informal brief is due 10/18/2021. [MMA] [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
