In re: Knauf Insulation, Inc.
| In re: KNAUF INSULATION, INC. and KNAUF INSULATION SPRL |
| JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, JOHNS MANVILLE, INC. and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
| 22-166 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER filed granting motion [ # 6 ] filed by Respondent Katherine K. Vidal. The Director's response to the petition is due on or before 10/17/2022. Knauf's reply to the Director's response to the petition is due no later than 10/27/2022. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [875122] [NL] [Entered: 09/30/2022 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 12 REPLY of Petitioners Knauf Insulation, Inc. and Knauf Insulation SPRL to response [ # 11 ]. Service: 09/30/2022 by email. [874966] [22-166] [Joshua Larsen] [Entered: 09/30/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE of Respondent Katherine K. Vidal to Doc No. [ # 7 ], [ # 7 ]. Service: 09/29/2022 by email. [874912] [22-166] [Kakoli Caprihan] [Entered: 09/29/2022 08:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE from Johns Manville Corp. and Johns Manville, Inc. to Doc No. [ # 4 ], [ # 4 ], [ # 7 ], [ # 7 ]. Service: 09/29/2022 by email. [874902] [22-166] [William Milliken] [Entered: 09/29/2022 06:48 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interest for Johns Manville Corp.; Johns Manville, Inc.. Service: 09/29/2022 by email. [874901] [22-166] [William Milliken] [Entered: 09/29/2022 06:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 Entry of appearance for William H. Milliken as counsel for Johns Manville Corp.; Johns Manville, Inc.. Service: 09/29/2022 by email. [874900] [22-166] [William Milliken] [Entered: 09/29/2022 06:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE of Petitioners Knauf Insulation, Inc. and Knauf Insulation SPRL to the motion [ # 6 ] filed by Respondent Katherine K. Vidal with MOTION to for an emergency stay pending appeal under Rule 8/18, to extend time. Service: 09/28/2022 by email [874566] [22-166]--[Edited 09/29/2022 by MMA to correct relief] [Joshua Larsen] [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION of Respondent Katherine K. Vidal to extend time. Service: 09/27/2022 by email. [874238] [22-166] [Kakoli Caprihan] [Entered: 09/27/2022 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Entry of appearance for Kakoli Caprihan; Thomas W. Krause; Farheena Y. Rasheed; Robert J. McManus as counsel for Respondent Katherine K. Vidal. Service: 09/27/2022 by email. [874236] [22-166] [Kakoli Caprihan] [Entered: 09/27/2022 03:55 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER filed; Within seven days from the date of filing of this petition [ # 2 ], the Director is directed to respond to the petition. Johns Manville Corp. and Johns Manville, Inc. may also file a response within that time. Any reply in support of the petition is due no later than three days after the last-filed response. (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [873992] [LMS] [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:18 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Entry of appearance for Joshua P. Larsen as counsel for Petitioners Knauf Insulation SPRL and Knauf Insulation, Inc. Service: 09/22/2022 by US mail. [873580] [ALK] [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION of Petitioners Knauf Insulation SPRL and Knauf Insulation, Inc. for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21. Service: 09/22/2022 by US mail. [873579] [ALK] [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 Miscellaneous case docketed. Received: 09/22/2022. [873576] Entry of Appearance is due on 10/07/2022. Certificate of Interest is due on 10/07/2022. [ALK] [Entered: 09/23/2022 09:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
