Mohammed v. US
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 22-2052
Filed: July 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nature of Suit: Taking - Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 15, 2022 MOHAMMED v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CORRECTED ORDER: correcting Court Order for other relief [12],Court Order for summary affirmance [12],Court Order [12]; reason(s): to remove the word informal from Action 2 on page 3. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [871950] [LMS] [Entered: 09/15/2022 11:05 AM]
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER filed denying as moot motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. No fee payment is required for this appeal. Mr. Mohammed's corrected informal opening brief, ECF No. 10, is accepted for filing. The judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims is affirmed. Each side shall bear its own costs.; (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [871899] [LMS] [Entered: 09/15/2022 10:27 AM]
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Entry of appearance for James W. Poirier as counsel for Appellee US. Service: 08/08/2022 by email. [865556] [22-2052] [James Poirier] [Entered: 08/08/2022 06:22 PM]
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. Service: 08/04/2022 by email. [864867] --[Edited 09/15/2022 by KMH - compliance review complete] This document has been accepted. See Order [12] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 08/04/2022 01:43 PM]
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed, Corrected Opening Brief [ # 8 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/11/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [864826] [KMH] [Entered: 08/04/2022 11:33 AM]
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CORRECTED COMBINED OPENING BRIEF & APPX (FCR 30(d)) FILED by Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. Service: 08/03/2022 by email. [864658] [22-2052] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 9 ] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:34 PM]
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed, Corrected Opening Brief [ # 6 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 08/10/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [864616] [KMH] [Entered: 08/03/2022 01:22 PM]
July 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 COMBINED OPENING BRIEF & APPX (FCR 30(d)) FILED by Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. Service: 07/31/2022 by email. [863968] [22-2052] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 7 ] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 07/31/2022 04:23 PM]
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed, Opening Brief with Appendix [ # 4 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document is due on 08/05/2022. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [863887] [EKD] [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:56 PM]
July 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 COMBINED OPENING BRIEF & APPX (FCR 30(d)) FILED by Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. Service: 07/24/2022 by email. [862717] [22-2052] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No. [ # 5 ] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 07/24/2022 05:10 PM]
July 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION of Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed for leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis. Service: 07/24/2022 by email. [862716] [22-2052] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 07/24/2022 02:57 PM]
July 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MODIFIED ENTRY: Notice of Unrepresented Person Appearance and consent to Electronic Filing for Appellant Mr. Abdul Mohammed. Service: 07/24/2022 by email. [862715]--[Edited 07/29/2022 by JAL to correct filing event] [Abdul Mohammed] [Entered: 07/24/2022 02:55 PM]
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 07/20/2022. [862486] Entry of Appearance due 08/05/2022. Appellant/Petitioner's brief is due 09/20/2022. [KMH] [Entered: 07/22/2022 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mohammed v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ABDUL MOHAMMED
Represented By: Abdul Mohammed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By: James William Poirier Esq. I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?