Shamrock Building Materials, Inc. v. US
| SHAMROCK BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. |
| UNITED STATES |
| 23-1648 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/17/2023. [911776] Entry of Appearance due 04/06/2023. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/06/2023. Docketing Statement due 04/24/2023. Appellant's brief is due 05/22/2023. [MMA] [Entered: 03/23/2023 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shamrock Building Materials, Inc. v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SHAMROCK BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | R. Will Planert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
