Ravgen, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
| RAVGEN, INC. |
| LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS |
| 25-1570 |
| March 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 **TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. No further extensions should be anticipated. The opening brief is due 07/21/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [1085633] [MMA] [Entered: 04/28/2025 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION of Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings to extend the time to 07/21/2025 to file brief. Service: 04/23/2025 by email. [1084714] [25-1570] [Gregory Castanias] [Entered: 04/23/2025 07:31 PM] |
| Filing 11 Corrected Entry of Appearance for Gregory A. Castanias; Tracy Stitt; Amelia DeGory; Brendan D. Duffy; John R. Boule III; Daniele San Roman as counsel for Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. Service: 04/03/2025 by email. [1080112] [25-1570] [John Boule] [Entered: 04/03/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Entry of Appearance [ # 2 ], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 04/10/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1080055] [IMH] [Entered: 04/03/2025 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement for the Appellee Ravgen, Inc.. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079546] [25-1570] [Kerri-Ann Limbeek] [Entered: 04/01/2025 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee Ravgen, Inc.. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079545] [25-1570] [Kerri-Ann Limbeek] [Entered: 04/01/2025 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interest for Appellee Ravgen, Inc.. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079544] [25-1570] [Kerri-Ann Limbeek] [Entered: 04/01/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 Entry of Appearance for Kerri-Ann Limbeek; Frederick J. Ding; John M. Desmarais; Brian D. Matty as counsel for Appellee Ravgen, Inc.. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079542] [25-1570] [Kerri-Ann Limbeek] [Entered: 04/01/2025 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement for the Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079522] [25-1570] [Gregory Castanias] [Entered: 04/01/2025 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079519] [25-1570] [Gregory Castanias] [Entered: 04/01/2025 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interest for Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079518] [25-1570] [Gregory Castanias] [Entered: 04/01/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entry of Appearance for Gregory A. Castanias; Tracy Stitt; Amelia DeGory; Brendan D. Duffy; John R. Boule III; Daniele San Roman as counsel for Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. Service: 04/01/2025 by email. [1079516] [25-1570] This document is non-compliant. See Doc No.[ # 10 ] [Gregory Castanias] [Entered: 04/01/2025 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 03/20/2025. [1077112] Entry of Appearance is due on 04/04/2025. Certificate of Interest is due on 04/04/2025. Docketing Statement is due on 04/04/2025. Appellant's brief is due on 05/20/2025. [IMH] [Entered: 03/21/2025 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
