Asafi v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
| JAMIL ASAFI, as Trustee of 301 Patent Trust |
| WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| 26-1889 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit |
| Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Appeal docketed. Received: 05/26/2026. [1170974] Entry of Appearance is due on 06/16/2026. Certificate of Interest is due on 06/16/2026. Docketing Statement is due on 06/16/2026. Appellant's brief is due on 08/03/2026. [JSP] [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Asafi v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMIL ASAFI, as Trustee of 301 Patent Trust | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Charles Deming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Aaron E. Hankel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
