Innolux Corporation v. United States
Innolux Corporation |
United States |
1:2024cv00171 |
September 7, 2024 |
U.S. Court of International Trade |
Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons served by Clerk's Office upon: Plaintiff, Defendant and U.S. Customs and Border Protection . (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 8 Summons Transmitted to Port CEE 007 - Electronics. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 7 Summons deemed filed. Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 6 Order entered on 9/9/2024 granting Motion for errata. ORDERED that the summons Form 01 (Exhibit 2 to plaintiff's motion) is accepted for filing. (Related Doc #5 ). (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 5 Consent Motion for errata to correct document number# 1 filed with the Court electronically on 09/07/2024 (related document(s) #1 ). Responses due by 9/30/2024. Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Smithweiss, Erik) |
Filing 4 Form 11 Notice of Appearance . Filed by Mathias Rabinovitch of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United States.(Rabinovitch, Mathias) |
Filing 3 Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Smithweiss, Erik) |
Filing 2 Form 5 Information Statement . Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. (Smithweiss, Erik) |
Filing 1 [***NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SUPERSEDED BY DOC #7 ***] Summons . Filed by Erik D. Smithweiss of Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP on behalf of Innolux Corporation. Protests and entries due by 12/6/2024. (Smithweiss, Erik) Modified on 9/9/2024 (Almonte, Giselle). |
Search for this case: Innolux Corporation v. United States | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Innolux Corporation | |
Represented By: | Erik D. Smithweiss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States | |
Represented By: | CBP Assistant Chief Counsel |
Represented By: | Attorney-in-Charge |
Represented By: | Mathias Rabinovitch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.