Deane v. Tucker, et al
1:2000cv02361 |
November 30, 2000 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boyd N. Boland |
Walker D. Miller |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 10/26/10. (ebs, ) |
Filing 77 MINUTE ORDER, Set Hearings: Status Conference set for 10/14/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge Walker D. Miller; by Judge Walker D. Miller on 7/20/2009. (gkram) |
Filing 33 ORDER of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Hegarty recused. Clerk is directed to reassign the consolidated matters by random draw to another magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/12/2007. (llr, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER AND NOTICE re: 30 Joint MOTION for Order to Issue Notice to Pitkin County Pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. 30-28-10110cII and for Entry of Order Approving Proposed Global Settlement by Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Walker D. Miller on 2/8/07. (dln, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deane v. Tucker, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.