Aviles v. Archuletta et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv01329
Filed: July 10, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 41 Notice of Appeal by Gene Aviles, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/01/10. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, )
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER ACCEPTED 29 Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge. Applicant's Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254, filed July 10, 2006 2 , is DENIED and this civil action is hereby DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE. Certificate of appealability should not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/29/2010.(erv, ) Modified on 3/1/2010 to add text re: certificate of appealability(gmssl, ). Modified on 3/1/2010 added text of appealability)(erv, ).
July 10, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/10/06. (gms, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aviles v. Archuletta et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?