Dhingra v. Crocs, Inc. et al
| Neel Dhingra |
| Crocs, Inc., Ron Snyder and Peter Case |
| 1:2007cv02351 |
| November 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
Final Judgment. In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the following Final Judgment with respect to the Settling Parties is hereby entered as set forth in the Final Judgment and Order of Partial Dismissal With Prejudice [Docket No. 222] entered by United States District Judge Philip A. Brimmer on September 19, 2014 by Clerk on 09/26/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER granting 207 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court will issue a separate order setting forth the award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses in accordance with the Stipulation by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/18/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS. The Individual Defendants' 108 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Corrected Consolidated Amended Complaint is granted, and plaintiffs' claims against Peter Case, Raymond Croghan, Scott Crutchfield, Russ Hammer , Michael Margolis, Michael Marks, John McCarvel, Richard Sharp, Thomas Smach, and Ronald Snyder in Counts One and Two and as to Count Four of the 87 Corrected Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint are dismissed.The 104 Motion of Defendant D eloitte & Touche LLP to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Corrected Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint is granted, and Count Three of the Corrected Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint is dismissed. Crocs' 107 Motion to Dismiss Plaintif fs' Corrected Consolidated Amended Complaint is granted, and plaintiffs' claims against Crocs in Counts One, Two, and Four of the Corrected Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint are dismissed. This case, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed. All other motions are denied as moot, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/28/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting 105 Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP's Request for Judicial Notice. Granting 109 Defendant Crocs, Inc. and various individual defendants' Request for Judicial Notice as set forth in this Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/24/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/16/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
120
MINUTE ORDER granting 118 Unopposed Motion For Leave to File Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motions to Dismiss With Corrections by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 06/04/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
94
MINUTE ORDER granting 91 parties Joint Motion to Adjourn Scheduling/Planning Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 03/03/2009 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 02/02/2009.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER, A Scheduling/Planning Conference is set for 3/3/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204, Second Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. On or before 01/19/2009, lead counsel for lead Plaintiffs and the Class shall file a joint status report containing a list of parties who remain in the litigation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/08/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
