Beylik v. Estep et al
| Thomas John Beylik |
| Al Estep, Fremont Correctional Facility, David L. Michaud, Curtis W. Devin and John Suthers |
| 1:2007cv02710 |
| December 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 58 Notice of Appeal by Thomas Beylik, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/02/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Application is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice on the merits. Ordered that each party shall bear his own costs and attorney's fees by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/15/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 50 Applicants Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 51 Applicants Motion to Amend Petition by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/14/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER STRIKING 46 Advisory of Complaint and Request for Restraint filed by Thomas John Beylik, 48 Notice Advisory Denial of Parole filed by Thomas John Beylik, in accordance with this Courts October 7, 2008 Order. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/17/09. (erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
