Wood v. Milyard et al
Petitioner: Patrick Wood
Respondent: Kevin Milyard and Colorado Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2008cv00247
Filed: February 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER Vacating Grant of Conditional Habeas Corpus Relief. ORDERED that the clerk of the court is directed to return the state court record in People v. Wood, Adams County District Court Case No. 86CR123, to the Adams County District Court. ORDERED the conditional grant to Mr. Wood of habeas corpus relief in the order of August 23, 2013, is vacated. ORDERED that the clerk of the court is directed to close this case by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/29/14. (jhawk, )
August 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER Pursuant to Tenth Circuit Mandate. ORDERED that Respondents provide me with a written status report every sixty (60) days as what, if any, state court proceedings are underway to eliminate either one of Mr. Wood's murder convictions within a reasonable time by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/23/13. (jjhsl, )
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 AMENDED Order 50 for State Court Record by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 05/30/12. (jjhsl, )
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER Returning State Court Record by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/14/11. (jjh, )
August 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 27 Notice of Appeal by Patrick Wood, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/11/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, )
July 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Wood. For the reasons stated,the habeas corpus relief will be denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the remaining claims 1(a) and (2) are dismissed as meritless, the habeas corpus application is denied, and the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear his own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/6/09. (erv, )
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER for State Court Records. IT IS ORDERED that, on or before Monday, April 20, 2009, the respondents shall provide me with the record from the state trial court. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/14/09. (erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. Milyard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Milyard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Colorado Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?