Everhart et al v. Children's Hospital, The et al
| Michael R. Everhart and Karmella Franic Everhart |
| Children's Hospital, The and Centura Health |
| 1:2008cv00605 |
| March 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward W. Nottingham |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER granting 130 the parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, each party to pay his, her or its own costs and attorneys fees with regard to the claims raised against these Defendants. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/18/09.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER. In lieu of the Order of 06/30/2009, this case shall be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. The parties shall have ten days from the date a court with proper jurisdiction in Ohio approves the settlement entered on behalf of CharlesEverhart within which to submit papers necessary to have this matter dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 09/30/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER granting 108 Defendant The Childrens Hospital Motion for Summary Adjudication of Question of Law; granting 111 CHIC Amended Motion forDetermination of Law by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/27/09.(erv, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
