Medina v. Stong et al
| Benito Medina |
| Dave Stong, Alamosa County Jail, Don Petoss, Ron Goodman and Moses Zamora |
| 1:2008cv01125 |
| May 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 49 , filed02/25/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. Defendants Motion To Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment 33 , filed 04/02/2009, is GRANTED as a mo tion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Don Petross, Sheriff Depute, Jane Doe, Sheriff Deputy, and Sargent [sic] Ron Goodman, Sheriff Deputy, and against plaintiff, Benito Medina, as to all claims and causes of action asserted herein. Defendants are AWARDED their costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/29/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER granting 45 Motion to Withdraw Entry of Appearance of Richard C.Anguiano as Counsel of Record for Defendants. Attorney Richard C. Anguianois relieved of any further representation of Defendants in the above captioned matter. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/21/2009.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
