Leffler v. Dillon Companies Inc., King Soopers Division
Plaintiff: Raymond L. Leffler
Defendant: Dillon Companies Inc., King Soopers Division
Case Number: 1:2008cv01418
Filed: July 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: David M. Ebel
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/20/09. (gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leffler v. Dillon Companies Inc., King Soopers Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond L. Leffler
Represented By: Andrew T. Brake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon Companies Inc., King Soopers Division
Represented By: Edward John Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?