Oteng et al v. Golden Star Resources, Ltd. et al
Paul Oteng and B.D. Goldfields, Ltd. |
Golden Star Resources, Ltd. and St. Jude Resources, Ltd. |
1:2008cv01852 |
August 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Stockholders Suits Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER denying 53 Plaintiffs' Rule 59(E) Motion to Alter, Amend, and Stay Judgment and Plaintiffs' Rule 62(B)(3) Motion for Stay of Judgment, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/28/09.(ebs, ) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant Golden Star Resources, Ltd; Defendant St. Jude Resources, Ltd. is DISMISSED pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).; granting 20 Motion for Costs, and, Motion for Attorney Fees; DENYING as moot 20 Motion to Stay; Defendants are awarded costs and attorneys fees under Rule 41(d) in the amount of $15,000.00. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/8/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 50 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: taking under advisement 13 Motion to Dismiss; taking under advisement 20 Motion for Costs; taking under advisement 20 Motion for Attorney Fees; taking under advisement 20 Motion to Stay; Motion Hearing held on 3/19/2009. (Court Reporter Therese Lindblom.) (wydcd, rrk) |
Filing 43 ORDER granting 18 Defendants unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery ; granting 18 Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Deter Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Scheduling Process Pending Determination of Motion to Dismiss. The Scheduling Conference set for Fe bruary 9, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED; The parties are directed to file a status report with this court within ten days of the district courts ruling on the pending motion to dismiss if any portion of the action remains pending. A scheduling conference will be set at that time if necessary.Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/16/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a review of the parties responses to the Courts Order of December 11, 2008. In that Order, I instructed the parties to file brief statements on the issue of whether Defendants Motion to Dismiss should be converted to a summary judgment motion because the motion and response both attach affidavits and/or other evidence outside of the pleadings. Having reviewed the parties positions, I decline to convert the motion to dismiss into a summary judgment motion. Signed by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/5/09. (erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.