Cogswell v. Paulson et al
Plaintiff: |
John Marshall Cogswell |
Defendant: |
Henry Paulson and Richard Cheney |
Case Number: |
1:2008cv01929 |
Filed: |
September 9, 2008 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Office: |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
County: |
Chaffee |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Presiding Judge: |
Kristen L. Mix |
Nature of Suit: |
None |
Cause of Action: |
U.S. Government Defendant |
Jury Demanded By: |
28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 2, 2009 |
Filing
29
AMENDED ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The magistrate judges Recommendation on Defendants Motion To Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) 22 filed 02/09/2009, is APP ROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The magistrate judges Supplemental Recommendation To Dismiss 24 filed 02/12/009, also is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The objections stated in Plaintiffs Objections to Proposed Findi ngs and Recommendation s of Magistrate 25 filed 02/20/2009, are OVERRULED. Defendants Motion To Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) 8 filed 11/14/2008 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, United States Senate, as set f orth in plaintiffs Amended Complaint 23 filed 02/10/2009, are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, United States Senate, and against plaintiff, John Marshall Cogswell, as to all claims for relief and causes of action. Defendant is AWARDED its costs by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/02/2009. (sah, )
|
February 27, 2009 |
Filing
28
ORDER. The magistrate judges Recommendation on Defendants Motion To Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) 22 , filed 02/9/2009 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The magistrate judges Supplemental Recommendation To Di smiss 24 filed 02/12/2009 also is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The objections stated in Plaintiffs Objections to Proposed Findings and Recommendation s of Magistrate 25 filed 02/20/2009 are OVERRULED. Defendants Motion To Dism iss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) 8 filed 11/14/2008, is GRANTED. plaintiffs proposed Amended Complaint 23 , filed 02/10/2009 is STRICKEN. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, Joseph. R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States Se nate, are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States Senate, and against plaintiff, John Marshall Cogswell, as to all claims for relief and causes of action. Defendant is AWARDED his costs by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 02/27/2009.(sah, )
|
February 12, 2009 |
Filing
24
SUPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS: that the 23 Plaintiffs Amended Complaint be sua sponte dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/12/2009. (sah, )
|
February 9, 2009 |
Filing
22
RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1): it is hereby RECOMMENDED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) 8 filed 11/14/2008 be GRANTED by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/09/2009. (sah, )
|
February 5, 2009 |
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER granting 18 Plaintiffs Rule 25 and Rule 41 Motions. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Defendant Henry Paulson is dismissed from this action. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Defendant Richard Cheney is automatically substituted by Joseph R. Biden, Jr by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/05/2009.(sah, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?