Trustees of the Teamsters Local Union No. 435 Construction Division Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Duffy Crane, Inc.
| Trustees of the Teamsters Local Union No. 435 Construction Division Health and Welfare Trust Fund |
| Duffy Crane, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv02201 |
| October 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Adams |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER for DISMISSAL. Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal, this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/20/10. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Vacating re: 10 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/11/2010. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
52
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. It is Recommended that Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Second Counterclaim 28 be Denied by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/10/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
50
MINUTE ORDER: granting 48 The Plaintiffs Unopposed Revised Motion for aSecond Amendment to the Scheduling Order. The Scheduling Order is amended asfollows: Discovery Cut-off: December 14, 2009; All depositions to be completed: January 19, 2010; Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 2, 2010. The Pretrial Conference is reset to April 5, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. The proposedPretrial Order, is due on or before March 29, 2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/9/09.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
39
Minute ORDER granting 37 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/8/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 1/8/2010. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/26/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/5/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/03/09.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
16
Minute ORDER granting 14 Motion to Amend Answer. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept the attached First Amended Answer and Counterclaim for filing by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/02/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 3/27/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/26/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trustees of the Teamsters Local Union No. 435 Construction Division Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Duffy Crane, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the Teamsters Local Union No. 435 Construction Division Health and Welfare Trust Fund | |
| Represented By: | Ann Kristin O'Connell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Duffy Crane, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
