Qwest Corporation v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission et al
Plaintiff: Qwest Corporation
Defendant: Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Ron Binz, James Tarpey and Matt Baker
Case Number: 1:2008cv02653
Filed: December 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 47:0332 Telecommunications Act of 1996

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER FOR AMENDED JUDGMENT. Clerk of this court shall enter an amended judgment declaring that in Colo. PUC Decision No. R08-0164 (Recommended Decision of Administrative Law Judge, dated February 19, 2008); Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-0969 (Order on Exceptions, dated July 30, 2008), and Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-1164 (Order on Application for Rehearing, Reargument and Reconsideration, dated October 29, 2008), the Colorado Public UtilitiesCommission incorrectly applied the definition of business line as defined in 47 C.F.R. § 51.5 when the Commission found and concluded that residential lines should be excluded from the UNE loop component of the business line tallies; and further declaring that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission incorrectly applied the definition of business line set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 51.5 when the Commission found and concluded that lines for non-switched services should be excluded from the UNE loop component of the business line tallies, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/3/2011. (rpmcd)
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Denying 37 MOTION to Amend 36 Clerk's Judgment, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/31/2010. (rpmcd)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Memorandum Decision. ORDERED that judgment shall enter declaring that in Colo. PUC Decision No. R08-0164 (Recommended Decision of Administrative Law Judge, dated February 19, 2008);Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-0969 (Order on Exceptions, dated July 30, 2008), and Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-1164 (Order on Application for Rehearing, Reargument and Reconsideration, dated October 29, 2008), the Colorado Public Utilities Commission applied an erroneous interpretation of business line as defined in 47 C. F.R. § 51.5 when the Commission found and concluded that residential lines should be excluded from the UNE loop component of the business line tallies. ORDERED that judgment shall enter declaring that in Colo. PUC Decision No. R08-0164 (Recommen ded Decision of Administrative Law Judge, dated February 19, 2008); and Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-0969 (Order on Exceptions, dated July 30, 2008), and Colo. PUC Decision No. C08-1164 (Order on Application for Rehearing, Reargument and Reconsideratio n, dated October 29, 2008), the Colorado Public Commission correctly applied the definition of business line set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 51.5 when the Commission found and concluded that lines for non-switched services should be excluded from the UNE loop component of the business line tallies by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 01/28/10. (jjh, ) Modified on 1/28/2010 to correct spelling error (jjh, ).
January 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/19/2009 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 12, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/21/2009. (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Qwest Corporation v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Qwest Corporation
Represented By: David Wayne McGann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Binz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Tarpey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?