Lewis v. Denver Fire Department et al
| Thomas R. Lewis |
| Denver Fire Department, Keith Mehrens and Keith (I) Mehrens |
| 1:2009cv00004 |
| January 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Denver |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
288
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and Order of Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the Court enters its final judgment in favor of the defendants, the City and County of Denver and Daniel Diaz, and against the plaintiff, Thomas R. Lewis. Thi s civil action and all remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. As the prevailing parties, defendants are awarded their reasonable costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/19/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 193 Defendants Corrected Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Claim 4; Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Claim 6 against the City and County of Denver; Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Claim 6 against the Denver Fire Department; Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Claim 7, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/2/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: A five-day Jury Trial is set for 1/7/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for 11/30/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 02/09/2012. (rbjsec. )
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER granting 150 Motion for Leave to appear by telephone for Scheduling Conference 2/9/2012 09:30 AM, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/30/2012.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
149
MINUTE ORDER granting 147 Motion to Lift Stay of Discovery. The Discovery Stay Order 42 is VACATED. This case remains set for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on 2/9/2012, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/11/12.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 2/9/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/3/2012. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion to Dismiss. It is GRANTED as to defendants Nuanes, Hynes, and Mehrens but DENIED as to defendant DIAZ. Granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion to Dismiss. It is denied as to defenda nt Denver Fire Department. It is denied as moot as to defendants Nuanes, Hynes and Diaz. Denying 129 Motion to Dismiss. Denying as moot 130 Motion to Dismiss. The Court sua sponte dismisses the Fifth Cause of Action in the Fourth Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/29/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
141
MINUTE ORDER denying 139 Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay of Discovery and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A for those reasons as outlined in docket nos. 42 and 128 . By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/21/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
128
MINUTE ORDER granting 120 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Based on Qualified Immunity. Discovery in this case is stayed until there is a ruling on the pending motion to dismiss that is based on qualified immunity, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/29/10.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting in part and denying in part as moot 92 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. Granting in part and denying in part as moot 102 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss. Granting in part and denying in part 112 Plaintiff& #039;s Motion to Amend. Plaintiff's request to file the proposed complaint attached to his motion for leave to amend is denied. The Court grants plaintiff leave to file a fourth amended complaint by 10/29/10. Denying as moot 93 Defendants&# 039; Motion to Dismiss Based on Qualified Immunity. Denying as moot 101 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Based on Qualified Immunity. Denying as moot 116 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/28/10.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
111
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Motion Hearing / Status Conference held on 4/20/2010.Denying 104 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Violation of the Court's Protective Order - Docket No. 40.(Court Reporter FTR - Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Denying 78 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Partially Lift Stay of Discovery; Denying 84 Plaintiff's Third Motion to Partially Lift Stay of Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/18/2009.(mjwcd )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting 73 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Attached Third Amended Complaint and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 A. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is accepted for filing as of the date of this Order. The Third Amended Complaint is now the operative Complaint in this case. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/4/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
71
MINUTE ORDER granting 66 Plaintiff's Motion to Partially Lift Stay of Discovery [Docket #42] and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A);Plaintiff may serve a subpoena duces tecum upon the non-parties Verizon and the Denver Police Department only and may not conduct any other discovery until further order of the court, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 09/29/2009.(mjwcd )
|
|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 24 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Based on Qualified Immunity, and denying as moot 26 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1)&(6), by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/30/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER granting 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Attached Second Amended Complaint and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 (A). The Second Amended Complaint is accepted for filing as of the date of this Minute Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/6/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery Based on Qualified Immunity. Discovery is stayed until Judge Brimmer rules on 24 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Based Upon Qualified Immunity. Parties shall file a written Status Report concerning the 24 Motion to Dismiss on or before 7/1/2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/1/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/28/09. (ebs, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying as moot 5 Defendant Denver Fire Department's Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/15/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the Attached Amended Complaint. The Tendered Amended Complaint (Docket No. 12-2) is accepted for filing as of the date of this Minute Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/14/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER re: 7 Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone at Scheduling Conference. Attorney Anne T. Sulton may appear via telephone during the Scheduling Conference 3/11/09 at 9:30 am, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/5/09.(ebs, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: A Scheduling/Planning Conference isset for 3/11/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 01/14/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
