Stanko v. Quay et al
| Rudy Stanko |
| Herman Quay, Michael Nalley and Harley Lappin |
| 1:2009cv00371 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Jefferson |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 14 Notice of Appeal by Rudy Stanko, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 05/21/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion in district court.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus application is denied and the action dismissed without prejudice for the failure of Applicant to comply with the directives of the 03/04/09 order to cure and for his failure to prosecute. Ordered that the clerk of the court mail a copy of this order to Mr. Stanko at his new address by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/22/09. (jjh, ) Modified on 4/23/2009 to correct filing date (jjh, ).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Overruling Onjection. Ordered that Applicant continues to have 30 days from 03/04/09 in which to cure the designated deficiencies by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/03/09. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Construing 1 Application was Bivens Complaint and Directing Applicant to File Claims on Court-Approved Form within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/04/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
