Rhodes v. Physicians Health Partners et al
| Calvin Rhodes |
| Physicians Health Partners, CDOC Medical Care Provider, Jay Want and Stephen R. Krebs |
| 1:2009cv00482 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 35 filed09/23/2009, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The Defendants Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint 24 filed 05/28/2009 is GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favo r of the defendants, Physician Health Partners (PHP), Jay Want, M.D., and Stephen R. Krebs, M.D., and against the plaintiff, Calvin Rhodes. The defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. This case is DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 02/24/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
35
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is RECOMMENDED that 24 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint BE GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/23/2009. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/08/2009. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
