Cardenas et al v. Banner Health et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Cardenas and George Wittner
Defendant: Banner Health, Robert George Ruegg and Susan J. Ponder
Case Number: 1:2009cv00610
Filed: March 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 JUDGMENT by Clerk re 88 : judgment is entered for Defendants Banner Health,d/b/a North Colorado Medical Center; Robert George Ruegg, M.D., and Susan J. Ponder, R.N., and against Plaintiffs Lizbeth Cardenas and George Wittner, as natural parents and next friends to Decedent, Ian Wittner, and Lizbeth Cardenas, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ian Wittner, by Clerk on 7/16/2013. (rpmcd) Modified on 7/16/2013 (rpmcd ).
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER Denying 65 Motion for Attorney Fees, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/19/2011.(rpmcd )
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 3/22/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants Ruegg and Ponder's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity, filed October 20, 2010 47 , is granted dismiss ing First Claim for Relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Banner Health's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 20, 2010 48 , is granted as to First Claim for Relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Second, Third and Fourth Claims for Relief are dismissed without prejudice forlack of jurisdiction. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd )
July 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER Granting 42 Unopposed Motion to Amend 22 Scheduling Order. Deadline for plaintiffs to endorse rebuttal experts is extended to and including August 6, 2010, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/21/2010.(rpmcd )
April 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 4/22/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Full Documents or Request For In Camera Review By The Court, filed March 9, 2010 32 , is denied. Defend ants' Motion for Summary Judgment Based Upon Qualified Immunity, filed December 10, 2009 17 , is terminated as defendants may file a new dispositive motion based on the Amended Complaint filed. Counsel may stipulate to an earlier dispositive motions deadline.(Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Motion to Amend Complaint and the attached thereto is accepted for filing, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/12/2010.(rpmcd)
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 26 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The Scheduling Order is amended to reflect a revised deadline for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings of 02/24/10 by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 01/25/10.(jjh, )
December 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Deferring Ruling on 17 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment until sufficient discovery has been completed as to the relevant circumstances, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/11/2009.(rpmcd)
October 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/11/2009 at 10:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on December 3, 2009, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/16/2009. (rpmcd) Modified on 10/16/2009 to correct room location (jjh, ).
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Minute Entry- Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 9/29/2009 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Tracy L. Van Pelt appearance entered for defendants. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claim Brought Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed June 8, 2009 3 , is denied. Defendants shall file an answer in accordance with the rules. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cardenas et al v. Banner Health et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Cardenas
Represented By: Daniel P. Gerash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Wittner
Represented By: Daniel P. Gerash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Banner Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert George Ruegg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan J. Ponder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?