Marshall v. Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Barbara L. Marshall
Defendant: Nestle USA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00734
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute ORDER denying 25 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Nestle USA, Inc. and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/23/09.(kmtcd)
August 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RESETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 12/4/2009 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/21/09. (kmtcd)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Minute ORDER granting 20 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate and Reset Settlement Conference by Defendant Nestle USA, Inc. The Settlement Conference currently set for 9/25/09 is VACATED. The parties shall place a conference call to chambers no later than 5:00 p.m. on 8/25/09 to reschedule the settlement conference by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/18/09.(kmtcd)
June 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Setting Settlement Conference for 9/25/2009 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 06/30/09. (wjc, )
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/7/09. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Nestle USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara L. Marshall
Represented By: Andrew T. Brake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nestle USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?