Sayed v. Proffitt
Plaintiff: Hazhar A. Sayed
Defendant: Darryl R. Proffitt
Case Number: 1:2009cv00869
Filed: April 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Prison Condition Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FINDING ALL OTHER MOTIONS MOOT. Mr. Profitt's 68 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Darryl R. Profitt on all claims. The remaining motions (# 30 , 61 , 64 , 76 ) are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 09/27/2010.(wjc, )
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR INTERPRETER. Plaintiff Hazhar A. Sayed's 62 Motion for Interpreter for Court Proceedings is DENIED, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 04/21/2010.(wjc, )
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER denying 41 Plaintiff's Motion for Failure to Timely Serve Adverse Party; granting 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief in support of his motion for summary judgment no later than 02/08/2010, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/25/2010.(wjc, )
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/29/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/3/09. (msksec, )
May 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Setting Preliminary Scheduling Conference for 9/3/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 05/11/09. (wjc, )
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/8/09. (mskcd)
May 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/06/09. (wjc, )
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/01/2009. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sayed v. Proffitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hazhar A. Sayed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl R. Proffitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?