Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG
Cellport Systems, Inc. |
Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG |
1:2009cv01007 |
April 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boulder |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 327 ORDER: Fees, costs and interest are awarded to Cellport Systems, Inc. and against Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. in the total amount of $1,340,235.55. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/20/16. (jdyne, ) |
Filing 320 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 308 Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/19/16.(jdyne, ) |
Filing 310 ORDER granting Stipulation, judgment to enter by the clerk by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/8/16. (jdyne, ) |
Filing 301 ORDER re pre-judgment interest. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/29/15. (jdyne, ) |
Filing 292 ORDER VACATING STAY ORDERAND APPROVING RELEASE OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND. 291 Unopposed Motion to Vacate 274 Order on Motion to Stay is GRANTED. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/21/17.(jdyne, ) |
Filing 274 ORDER granting 273 Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 07/16/13. (alvsl) |
Filing 259 ORDER AND JUDGMENT re: 254 Bench Trial - Completed, This case was tried to the Court on September 20-21, 24-25, 27-29, 2012 with final arguments given on November 29, 2012, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/2/2013. (ervsl, ) |
Filing 219 ORDER. Defendant Peikers Motion for Further Ruling on Contract Interpretation as Matter of Law 202 is granted to the extent that, as requested, the Court has provided a further ruling on contract interpretation as a matter of law. However, the Court interprets the contract consistent with Cellports position regarding the territorial reach of the Agreement. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/6/2012.(sahsl, ) |
Filing 201 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS. Denying as moot 116 Motion to Bifurcate. The Court's ruling on construction of the disputed portions of the Agreement, 117 is GRANTED. The 149 objection is DENIED, and the order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/6/12.(lsw, ) |
Filing 199 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: A ten-day Bench Trial is set 9/17/2012 at 9:00 a.m. and a Trial Preparation/Final Pretrial Conference is set 8/24/2012 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge R. Brooke Jackson in Courtroom A902, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 01/25/2012. (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 183 MINUTE ORDER denying 172 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Mettenheimer Correspondence. Documents bates stamped PEIKER 025512, 025513 and 025515 through 025527, inclusive, and the English translation of the same shall be SEALED and not opened except by further Order of Court, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/31/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 182 ORDER granting 180 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for In Camera Review. Documents set forth in the Order shall be delivered to Magistrate Judge Watanabe chambers before 8/31/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/24/2011.(mjwcd) |
Filing 163 ORDER granting 133 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery. That Defendant shall provide responses to items b., c., d., and e., to Plaintiff on or before 03/31/2011. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion as this court finds that an award of expenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 under the circumstances and facts of this case would be unjust, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/04/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 143 ORDER granting 123 Defendant Peiker's Motion to Strike Cellport's Jury Demand, as set forth in the Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/27/2011.(mjwcd) |
Filing 109 ORDER granting 106 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Amendments to Deposition of Alexander Sennecke as set forth in the Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/13/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 104 MINUTE ORDER granting 102 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 61 With respect to Expert Witnesses, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/3/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 88 ORDER granting 84 Defendant's Motion to Amend Its Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaims. That the Defendants Second Amended Answer to the Amended Complaint and Counterclaims (docket no. 84 -1) is accepted for filing as of this date of this Order. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for the subject motion, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 04/14/2010.(wjc, ) |
Filing 80 MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Defendant Peiker's Motion to Reset Settlement Conference. Conference set 5/13/10 is vacated. Granting 76 Unopposed Motion to Amend Defendant Peiker's Answer and Counterclaims. Peiker's Amended Answer to Amended Complaint and Counterclaims is accepted for filing. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/2/10.(gms, ) |
Filing 62 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/15/10. (msksec, ) |
Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/09/2009. (wjc, ) |
Filing 26 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger: Status Conference held on 7/14/2009. 13 Motion to Remand to State Court is DENIED. (Court Reporter Paul Zucerman) (mskcd) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 Motion to Clarify. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant has 20 days after the Court issues an Order on the Motion to Remand to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/12/09.(wjc, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/14/09. (mskcd) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 16: In Court Hearing set for 7/14/2009 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/11/09. (msksec, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 05/01/2009. (sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cellport Systems, Inc. v. Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cellport Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Lisa A. Hogan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Peiker Acustic GMBH & Co. KG | |
Represented By: | Christopher Hulbert Toll |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.