Whitmore et al v. Statguard, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Whitmore, WKF Enterprises, LLC, Wanda K. Ford, Dylan Mumm, Carlyn Mumm and Kathryn Ford
Defendant: Statguard, LLC, David Kim Stanley, Michael J. Leary, Charles S. Bradford, Bruce Hoover and Linda Mitchell
Case Number: 1:2009cv01414
Filed: June 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 156 MINUTE ORDER. Matthew D. Spohns Motion To Withdraw 155 is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/29/2012.(sah, )
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER. On the terms stated in this order, the relief requested in the letter 146 filed by defendants, Chares S. Bradford and Michael J. Leary, on 4/14/2011, is GRANTED otherwise, the relief requested in the letter 146 filed by defendants, Chares S. Bradford and Michael J. Leary, on April 14, 2011, is DENIED. On the terms stated in this order, the relief requested in the letter 152 filed by defendants, Charles S. Bradford and Michael J. Leary, on 5/2/2011 is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/28/2012.(sah, )
April 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 145 AMENDED ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT in re: 143 Order filed on 3/25/2011. I enter this Amended Order Imposing Sanctions for Contempt of Court solely to (1) withdraw my finding that defendants Bruce Hoover and Linda Mitchell are in contempt of this court; and (2) to vacate all sanctions imposed against defendants Bruce Hoover and Linda Mitchell in the Order Granting Motion To Remand 122 and the Order Imposing Sanctions for Contempt of Court 143 filed 3/25/2011. The courts Order Imposing Sanctions for Contempt of Court 143 filed 3/25/2011, is WITHDRAWN and REPLACED and SUPERSEDED by this Amended Order Imposing Sanctions for Contempt of Court. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/6/2011.(sah, )
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER. The plaintiffs Motion Regarding Defendants Contempt of Order ToPay Sanctions 135 filed 3/16/2010, is GRANTED. The Plaintiffs Motion Regarding Lisa Welch Stevens Contempt of Order to Pay Sanctions and File Responsive Pleading 139 filed 11/4/2010, is GRANTED. Please see Order for details. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/25/2011.(sah, )
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER. the Plaintiffs Motion To Amend or Correct Order RemandingAction, or Alternatively To Adjudicate Pending Motions for Sanctions 123 filed 01/04/2010, is GRANTED to the extent the plaintiffs seek adjudication of their motion for sanctions [108 ] under § 1927, otherwise is DENIED. the Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 Against Lisa Welch Stevens 108 filed 12/07/2009, is GRANTED in part, otherwise DENIED. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, the plaintiffs are AWARD ED reasonable attorney fees in the amount of four thousand five hundred thirty-eight dollars. Lisa Welch Stevens shall pay this amount to counsel for the plaintiffs on or before 10/29/2010. On or before 10/08/2010, defense counsel, Lisa Welch Stevens, SHALL FILE a response to the plaintiffs Motion Regarding Defendants Contempt of Order To Pay Sanctions 135 filed 03/16/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/14/2010.(sah, )
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER. The Plaintiffs Motion To Remand for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction andfor Award of Fees and Costs 5 , is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED to the District Court of El Paso County, Colorado (where it was filed originally as Case No. 09CV1653). Un der 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the plaintiffs are awarded $4,000 dollars in attorney fees and costs. The defendants SHALL PAY $4,000 dollars in attorney fees and costs to the plaintiffs by 02/15/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/30/2009.(sah, )
December 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MINUTE ORDER granting 114 The Unopposed Motion of Defendants Hoover and Mitchell for Order... to Permit Waiver of Appearance at Settlement Conference. Defendants Hoover and Mitchell are excused from appearing at the Settlement Conference scheduled in this case on 01/06/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2009.(sah, )
December 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER granting in part 83 the Motion to File an Amended Answer Adding Counterclaims against Plaintiffs filed by Defendants StatGuard, Stanley, Leary and Bradford, as to the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh, eight, and ninth counterclaims. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/03/2009.TEXT ONLY ENTRY - NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (sah, )
November 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 73 Plaintiffs Motion to Shorten Safe Harbor Period under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/27/2009.(sah, )
November 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MINUTE ORDER granting 80 the Stipulated Motion to Amend Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption to reflect the name change from "StatGuard, LLC" to "StatGuard Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation." By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/9/2009. (mehcd)
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendants and for Award of Fees and Costs; granting in part and denying in part 57 Defendants' Amended Motion for Protective Order. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/6/2009. (mehcd)
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 66 Certain Defendants' Motion to File an Amended Answer Adding Counterclaims Against Plaintiffs for an apparent inconsistency. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/2/2009. (mehcd)
October 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 10/27/2009, denying 39 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, taking under advisement 43 Motion to Compel, and taking under advisement 57 Motion for Protective Order. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Motion for Protective Order and Response to Motion to Compel. Defendants may re-file their response and motion in separate documents on or before 10/13/2009. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/8/2009. (mehcd)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUE ORDER denying 30 Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer to Add Counterclaims Against Plaintiffs, and denying 34 Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer to Add Cross-Claims Against Third Parties. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/28/2009. (mehcd)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/20/09. Ten (10) day Jury Trial set for 6/21/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 6/4/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. (rebsec, )
August 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Request [Motion] for Award of Fees. Defendants' counsel is sanctioned in the amount of $496.00 to be paid to counsel for Plaintiff as a reasonable sanction of attorney's fees. This amount shall be paid no later than August 31, 2009. Counsel for Defendants shall file a Notice of Compliance with Order re: Sanctions on or before September 4, 2009. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/10/2009. (mehcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitmore et al v. Statguard, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Whitmore
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WKF Enterprises, LLC
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda K. Ford
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dylan Mumm
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlyn Mumm
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Ford
Represented By: Matthew David Spohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Statguard, LLC
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Kim Stanley
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Leary
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles S. Bradford
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Hoover
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Mitchell
Represented By: Lisa Welch Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?