Watkins v. Ruddy et al
Plaintiff: |
James R. Watkins |
Defendant: |
John Ruddy, Randy Penn and City and County of Denver |
Case Number: |
1:2009cv01534 |
Filed: |
June 30, 2009 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Office: |
Denver Office |
County: |
Denver |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Presiding Judge: |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 14, 2010 |
Filing
101
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice 100 is APPROVED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/14/2010. (sah, )
|
July 23, 2010 |
Filing
85
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Show Cause Hearing held on 7/23/2010. Granting 64 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Lisa A. Guerra terminated. Denying as MOOT 66 Motion for Sanction. Grantin g 68 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Joseph B. Conder. The Court finds the plaintiff in contempt of court and orders the plaintiff to pay the attorney fees and costs for the defendants having to appear on July 13, 2010, for the settlement conference. The defendants shall file an itemize affidavit of Bill of Costs and Attorney Fees with the Court on or before August 4, 2010. The plaintiff may file any response on or before August 16, 2010.(Court Reporter FTR: Ginny Kramer) (gkram)
|
July 12, 2010 |
Filing
61
ORDER. The Joint Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs 8th Amendment Claims In The First and Second Claims For Relief and The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims For Relief With Prejudice 57 filed 07/09/2010, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs 8th Amendment claims as stated in his First and Second Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/12/2010.(sah, )
|
May 10, 2010 |
Filing
43
PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/10/2010. (mjwcd)
|
April 7, 2010 |
Filing
38
ORDER. Based on defendants Response To Show Cause Order 37 filed 04/06/2010. IT IS ORDERED that my Order To Show Cause 36 filed 04/02/2010 is DISCHARGED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/07/2010. (sah, )
|
December 3, 2009 |
Filing
29
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference and reset for 2/22/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/03/09.(jjh, )
|
October 1, 2009 |
Filing
16
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER. Jury Trial set for 8/16/2010 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 7/23/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/1/09. (rebcd)
|
August 19, 2009 |
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER. Defendants Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint 8 is GRANTED. Defendants Unopposed (Stipulated) Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference Set on August 24, 2009 7 is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set before Magistrate Judge Watanabe on 08/24/2009, at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to 10/01/2009, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-502. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/19/2009.(sah, )
|
July 14, 2009 |
Filing
3
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2009 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/14/2009. (mjwcd )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?