Carr v. Hanley et al
Stephen M. Carr |
(I) Hanley, Hanley, (I) Samuels, Samuels and City of Aurora, The |
1:2009cv01677 |
July 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Kristen L. Mix |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his or its own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/24/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss Party. Party Samuels; (I) Samuels; Hanley and (I) Hanley are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his or her own costs and attorneys fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/3/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Amend Complaint. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part. To the extent the Plaintiff seeks to withdraw his claim for punitive damages against Defendant City of Aurora a nd his claims against Defendants Hanley and Samuels in their official capacities, the Motion is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent the Plaintiff seeks to add three defendants and amend the factual allegations of his Complaint, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. The Plaintiff may renew his request by filing a second motion to amend, attaching to the motion his proposed amended Complaint, on or before December 18, 2009. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/3/09.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.