Dembry v. Ploughe et al
Anthony S. Dembry |
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
1:2009cv01740 |
July 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Zita L. Weinshienk |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Applicatoin is denied and the action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Ordered that no certificate of appealabilty will issue because Mr. Dembry has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the procedural ruling is correct and whether the underlying claim has constitutional merit by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/11/10. (jjh, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER that the Order of Dismissal and the Judgment entered on 09/02/09 are vacated. Ordered that the Application and the action are reinstated. Ordered that the action is referred to Magistrate Boland for further initial review by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/15/09. (jjh, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER Denying Motion to Reconsider. Ordered that the 6 Letter is construed as a Motion to Reconsider is denied by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/21/09. (jjh, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Application is denied and the action is dismissed wihtout prejudice for failure to cure and for failure to prosecute by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/01/09. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.