Chamblin v. Astrue
Mildred Chamblin |
Michael J. Astrue |
SSA Noticing |
1:2009cv01955 |
August 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
John L. Kane |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 AMENDED ORDER Granting 22 Defendant's Unopposed Order on Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner 19 filed 9/24/10, is AMENDED to direct that the Commissioners final decision is vacated and the case remanded pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Per force the Judgment 20 filed September 28, 2010, is VACATED, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/29/10. (gmssl, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner is amended to direct that the Commissioners final decision is vacated and the case remanded pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and Per force the Judgment 20 filed September 28, 2010, is VACATED, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/23/10.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 12 Joint Case Management Plan for Social Secuirty Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 12/16/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 1/15/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 2/5/2010. By Judge John L. Kane on 11/19/2009. (sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.