Martinez v. Zavaras et al
| Raymond Martinez |
| Aristedes Zavaras and Colorado Attorney General |
| 1:2009cv02421 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER. The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 filed by the Applicant, Raymond Martinez, is denied. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/22/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER to Forward All Records and Transcripts. the Clerk of the Court for the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Colorado, as the lawful custodian of the records, shall forward the flat file and hearing transcripts for all proceedings i n the trial court and in the appellate court in People v. Raymond Martinez, Denver County District Court, Case No. 02CR4290, to the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, 901 Nineteenth Street, Room 105, Denver Colorado, 80294-3589, on or before 11/15/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/15/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER. The matter comes before the court on petitioners Motion Requesting Status of Case 25 filed 10/12/2010. The matter is now at issue and the court will issue a ruling as soon as practicable. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/13/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER. Prisoners Motion and Affidavit For Leave To Proceed PursuantTo 28 U.S.C. § 1915 15 filed 04/06/2010, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Petitioners Motion To Appoint Counsel 16 filed 04/06/2010, is DENIED. Petitioners Motio n For Discovery Pursuant To Rule 6(a) of The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and Rules 26-27, 34-35 of The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 18 filed 04/06/2010, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to show good cause pursuant to Rule 6(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioners Motion For Enlargement of Time 20 filed 04/07/2010, is GRANTED in part. Petitioner shall have until 05/05/2010, to file his reply to Respondents Answer To Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus 14 filed 03/22/2010. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/27/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Dismissing Case in Part and Drawing Case in Part to District Judge and to Magistrate Judge. Claims Four and Five are dismissed. Claims One, Two,and Three and the action shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 02/17/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered within 20 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 20 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/15/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
