Hansen et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Bret M. Hansen and Victoria K. Hansen |
Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
1:2009cv02736 |
November 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Christine M. Arguello |
Boyd N. Boland |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF BRET M. HANSEN WITH PREJUDICE. The Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 68 was filed on 5/23/2011. Plaintiff Bret M. Hansens claims in the above-captioned matter are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his or its own attorneys fees and costs. By Judge William J. Martinez on 6/3/2011. (sah2, ) |
Filing 66 ORDER I am informed that a settlement of all claims has been reached, subject to approval of the terms of the settlement by the probate court. Dismissal Paper due by 6/2/2011. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/2/2011. (erv, ) |
Filing 64 ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2011, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 59 ORDER: re: 47 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Rebuttal Expert Report and for Fed. R. Civ. P. 35 Examination filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company is granted. V.H. shall appear for an IME as follows: Time: The IME shall occur on a date and ti me as the parties may agree, but not later than January 17, 2011; Place: The IME shall occur at the offices of Dr. William D. Hansen, Ph.D., at 1777 South Harrison Street, Suite 840, Denver, Colorado 80210. Manner, Condition, and Scope: The IME may c onsist of a clinical interview, a mental status examination, and the administration of appropriate psychological tests; The person who will perform the examination: The examination shall be conducted by Dr. William D. Hansen, Ph.D.; The defendant sha ll designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 4, 2011. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/1/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/8/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 54 MINUTE ORDER : The discovery cut-off is extended to and including December 31, 2010, solely with respect to the remaining depositions; and the final pretrial conference set for January 4, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/4/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 46 ORDER granting 44 the Letter construed as a motion for clarification. The minute order 43 , filed 10/4/2010 vacating the settlement conference incorrectly states that it was vacated because the plaintiff failed to file a confidential settlement st atement. Instead, I vacated the settlement conference after reviewing the confidential settlement letters submitted by both sides, seeing that the parties settlement positions are extremely far apart, and determining that in view of those positions holding a settlement conference at this time would be a waste of resources. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/12/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 5 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Fourth Claim for Relief, and Plaintiffs CCPA claim (Count 4) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/4/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 1/25/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/9/09. (erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.