Trujillo et al v. Campbell et al
| Vicki (I) Lynn Trujillo and Vicki Lynn Trujillo |
| Timothy (I) Campbell, Timothy Campbell, Gerald (I) R. Whitman, Gerald R. Whitman and City and County of Denver |
| 1:2009cv03011 |
| December 29, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice re: 212 Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/26/12.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER denying 191 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54 (b), and denying as moot 184 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re 185 Notice of Appeal and 192 Motion to Stay by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/10/12.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying as moot 172 Motion to Strike by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/22/12.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion for Attorney Fees. Granting 166 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to Supplement Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Attorney's Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City and County of Denver shall remit payment of $2,382.50 to Plaintiff on or before 6/21/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/21/2012.(jjpsl, ) Modified on 5/21/2012 (jjpsl, ).
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER granting in part 126 Third Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories from Defendant City and County of Denver. ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Supplemental Response in opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 121 on or before 4/16/12. Defendants may Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment on or before 4/30/2012. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/19/2012.(jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER REJECTING 2/9/2012 131 Order on Motion to Compel. 126 Third MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories From Defendant City and County of Denver is reinstated. The Court REFERS Plaintiff's Third Motion to Compel to the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/13/2012. (jjpsl, )
|
|
Filing
131
MINUTE ORDER denying 126 Motion to Compel. Denver may file a motion for fees, in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3, on or before 2/23/12. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/9/12.(cmacd )
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another magistrate judge and the motions hearing set for October 4, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED . By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/3/2011.(sah2, ) Modified on 10/4/2011 to include language with regards to the vacating of the motions hearing (sah2, ).
|
|
Filing
60
Minute Entry for continuation of Motion Hearing 59 held on 10/20/2010 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Compel, granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Compel, and granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Compel.(Court Reporter FTR - Nick Richards)(kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
59
Minute Entry for Motion Hearing held on 10/18/2010 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Enforce and granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel. Defendants' request to den y all the plaintiff's motion for failure to confer in violation of Local Rule 7.1 is denied. Discovery due by 5/10/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 6/10/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/9/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. This hearing is continued to October 20, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. (Court Reporter FTR - Nick Richards) (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify Courts Minute Order Dated July 1, 2010. The deadline for Defendants to respond to all of Plaintiffs written discovery requests remains at July 8, 2010. The court finds that Plaintiff will n ot be prejudiced if Defendants are permitted additional time to respond to Plaintiffs discovery requests, notwithstanding the fact that Defendants Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time 23 , filed July 1, 2010 was filed after several of their resp onses to Plaintiffs discovery requests were due. As such, the court finds that it would have granted Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time outright, even if Plaintiff had opposed that motion on the grounds outlined in her Motion to Clarify. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/7/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/6/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
18
Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Motion for Protective Order. The proposed Protective Order is REFUSED by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/19/2010.(kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 7/30/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/30/2010. (kmtcd, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2010 09:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/12/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/05/2010. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
