Marzonie et al v. Brauch Enterprises II et al
Plaintiff: Michael James Marzonie, Jr., Mark Andrew Larson, Larson & Larimer P.C. and Evan Scott Ray
Defendant: Brauch Enterprises II, N. Gayle Brauch and Earl Brauch
Case Number: 1:2010cv00021
Filed: January 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Zita L. Weinshienk
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER denying 14 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal and Request for Temporary Order regarding State Court and Plaintiffs, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 02/11/10.(bjrsl, )
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Minute ORDER denying 8 Motion Court to Hold Jane Tidball in Contempt of Court by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/29/10.(jjh, )
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER for Summary Remand. Ordered that the motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Earl Brauch is granted. Ordered that this action is remanded summarily to the Jefferson County District Court. Ordered that the clerk of this court shall mail a certified copy of this order to the clerk of the Jefferson County District Court by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 01/19/10. (jjh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marzonie et al v. Brauch Enterprises II et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael James Marzonie, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Andrew Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larson & Larimer P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evan Scott Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brauch Enterprises II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Gayle Brauch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earl Brauch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?